AC Coupling in existing systems: Does a second storage system really work alongside KOSTAL?
Initial Situation (Typical Practical Case)
-
Existing PV system approx. 6 kW
-
Expansion by another 15 kW
-
New inverter: KOSTAL Plenticore G2 10.0 Plus (3-phase)
-
DC-connected battery (~5 kWh)
-
Separate emergency power circuit with switch (galvanically isolated)
-
Desired: 5 kW backup power, if necessary 3 kW single-phase
-
Key question:
"Is an inexpensive device with clean 50 Hz voltage sufficient for the existing PV inverters to continue operating in island mode?"
Why "providing 50 Hz" alone is not enough
If I provide a stable 50 Hz signal during a blackout, my PV inverter will recognize it as the grid – and continue to operate.
-
Frequency (50 Hz)
-
Voltage (e.g., 230/400 V)
-
defined impedance
-
stable short-circuit power
-
clean phase synchronization (for 3-phase systems)
-
standard-compliant protection logic
The Core Problem: Two Energy Management Systems at One Grid Connection Point
-
Own energy management
-
Own power control
-
Own measurement (Smart Meter / CT)
-
Own strategy for charging, discharging, zero-export
-
Power oscillation
-
Incorrect feed-in limitation
-
Mutual "ramping up and down"
-
Unclear priority in grid or island operation
-
Error messages or protective shutdowns
Two AC-coupled systems with their own grid power control should not be operated uncoordinated at the same grid connection point.
21 kW PV in island mode – what does that really mean?
-
PV power must be massively regulated in island mode
-
Surpluses must be immediately stored or curtailed
-
The grid-forming device must take over frequency and voltage control
What solutions are technically sound?
Solution 1: Implement backup power within the hybrid system (recommended option)
-
Only one energy management system
-
No competing CT signals
-
Clean phase control
-
Clearly defined emergency power circuit

Solution 2: Separate emergency power system – but as an independent supply area
"In a blackout, the refrigerator, router, and lights should continue to work."
-
Separate emergency power socket circuit
-
No common power control with the hybrid inverter
-
Clear electrical separation
Solution 3: Separate AC storage subsystem with its own distribution (cluster approach)
A third – technically more sophisticated – option is to set up an independent AC storage subsystem.
The existing hybrid system (e.g., KOSTAL + DC battery) remains untouched.
Additionally, a Sunpura S2400 system is integrated via a separate distributor with its own measurement and control circuit.
It is important that:
-
No common CT control at the same grid connection point
-
Clear physical separation of power ranges
-
Clear responsibility in island operation (only one system grid-forming)
This concept allows for scalable storage expansion (e.g., multiple S2400 in a cluster), but requires a clean system architecture. Without defined separation, control conflicts can arise between the energy management systems.
This solution is primarily suitable for projects where a structured subsystem architecture is planned – not as a "simple retrofit" into existing hybrid systems.

Common Misconceptions in AC Coupling Context
| Assumption | Reality |
| "50 Hz is sufficient" | Grid impedance, phase control and protection logic are just as crucial |
| "More storage = more security" | Incorrect control architecture can cause instability |
| "You can combine AC systems arbitrarily" | Measurement and control conflicts are common |
| "PV continues to run automatically in a blackout" | Only with grid-forming architecture |
Conclusion: AC coupling is not a modular principle
-
3-phase systems
-
Hybrid inverters
-
DC batteries
-
Smart meter control
-
Zero-export requirements
Our Recommendation for Existing Systems
-
Already operate a hybrid inverter with a DC battery
-
Have planned an emergency power circuit
-
Want to continue using PV in a blackout
Discussion desired
-
A PV expansion?
-
A second storage system?
-
Island or backup power in an existing system?