AC-Kopplung im Bestand: Funktioniert ein zweites Speichersystem neben KOSTAL wirklich?

AC coupling in existing systems: Does a second storage system really work alongside KOSTAL?

AC Coupling in existing systems: Does a second storage system really work alongside KOSTAL?

21 kW PV on the roof, DC battery on the hybrid inverter – and now the question arises: Can I simply add another AC-coupled storage system to continue using solar power in a blackout?
This is exactly the situation we are currently encountering frequently in the German market.
This article technically explains the limitations – and which solutions really work.

Initial Situation (Typical Practical Case)

  • Existing PV system approx. 6 kW
  • Expansion by another 15 kW
  • New inverter: KOSTAL Plenticore G2 10.0 Plus (3-phase)
  • DC-connected battery (~5 kWh)
  • Separate emergency power circuit with switch (galvanically isolated)
  • Desired: 5 kW backup power, if necessary 3 kW single-phase
  • Key question:
  • "Is an inexpensive device with clean 50 Hz voltage sufficient for the existing PV inverters to continue operating in island mode?"

Why "providing 50 Hz" alone is not enough

Many users think:
If I provide a stable 50 Hz signal during a blackout, my PV inverter will recognize it as the grid – and continue to operate.
Technically, this is too simplistic.
A grid-connected inverter not only requires:
  • Frequency (50 Hz)
  • Voltage (e.g., 230/400 V)
But also a grid-like reference system with:
  • defined impedance
  • stable short-circuit power
  • clean phase synchronization (for 3-phase systems)
  • standard-compliant protection logic
Especially for three-phase systems (as in the example with KOSTAL G2), a single-phase "island generator" is not sufficient.

The Core Problem: Two Energy Management Systems at One Grid Connection Point

Here lies the crucial point – and it is often underestimated.
A hybrid inverter like the KOSTAL Plenticore G2 with a DC battery operates in a closed control loop:
  • Own energy management
  • Own power control
  • Own measurement (Smart Meter / CT)
  • Own strategy for charging, discharging, zero-export
If an AC-coupled storage system with its own CT control is additionally installed at the same grid connection point, two parallel control loops are created.
In practice, this leads to:
  • Power oscillation
  • Incorrect feed-in limitation
  • Mutual "ramping up and down"
  • Unclear priority in grid or island operation
  • Error messages or protective shutdowns
This is simplified as a "measurement and control conflict".
Therefore:
Two AC-coupled systems with their own grid power control should not be operated uncoordinated at the same grid connection point.

21 kW PV in island mode – what does that really mean?

In our practical case, we are talking about ~21 kW of PV power in the long term.
However, the desired backup power requirement is only 5 kW.
This means:
  • PV power must be massively regulated in island mode
  • Surpluses must be immediately stored or curtailed
  • The grid-forming device must take over frequency and voltage control
A small "emergency power device" without true grid-forming capabilities can become unstable here.

What solutions are technically sound?

Solution 1: Implement backup power within the hybrid system (recommended option)

If a hybrid inverter with a DC battery is already installed, the backup power function should be resolved within this system.
Advantages:
  • Only one energy management system
  • No competing CT signals
  • Clean phase control
  • Clearly defined emergency power circuit
This solution is technically consistent and long-term stable.

Solution 2: Separate emergency power system – but as an independent supply area

If the goal is simply:
"In a blackout, the refrigerator, router, and lights should continue to work."
Then a separate AC system can be useful – but as an independent circuit, not as a parallel system at the main connection point.
This means:
  • Separate emergency power socket circuit
  • No common power control with the hybrid inverter
  • Clear electrical separation
Important: In this scenario, the existing PV inverters usually do not continue to operate during a blackout, as they do not see a standard-compliant reference grid.

Solution 3: Separate AC storage subsystem with its own distribution (cluster approach)

A third – technically more sophisticated – option is to set up an independent AC storage subsystem.

The existing hybrid system (e.g., KOSTAL + DC battery) remains untouched.
Additionally, a Sunpura S2400 system is integrated via a separate distributor with its own measurement and control circuit.

It is important that:

  • No common CT control at the same grid connection point

  • Clear physical separation of power ranges

  • Clear responsibility in island operation (only one system grid-forming)

This concept allows for scalable storage expansion (e.g., multiple S2400 in a cluster), but requires a clean system architecture. Without defined separation, control conflicts can arise between the energy management systems.

This solution is primarily suitable for projects where a structured subsystem architecture is planned – not as a "simple retrofit" into existing hybrid systems.


Common Misconceptions in AC Coupling Context


Assumption Reality
"50 Hz is sufficient" Grid impedance, phase control and protection logic are just as crucial
"More storage = more security" Incorrect control architecture can cause instability
"You can combine AC systems arbitrarily" Measurement and control conflicts are common
"PV continues to run automatically in a blackout" Only with grid-forming architecture

Conclusion: AC coupling is not a modular principle

Especially in the German market with:
  • 3-phase systems
  • Hybrid inverters
  • DC batteries
  • Smart meter control
  • Zero-export requirements
a clean system architecture is crucial.
AC coupling is a powerful concept – but only if the control strategy is unambiguous.

Our Recommendation for Existing Systems

If you:
  • Already operate a hybrid inverter with a DC battery
  • Have planned an emergency power circuit
  • Want to continue using PV in a blackout
Then the backup power solution should be implemented internally within the system – not by a second independent control system at the same grid connection point.
If, on the other hand, only a basic emergency supply is desired, a separate AC system can be a pragmatic solution – clearly separated from the existing energy management.

Discussion desired

Are you currently planning:
  • A PV expansion?
  • A second storage system?
  • Island or backup power in an existing system?
Tell us the key data of your system.
We will technically analyze your system architecture – before control conflicts arise later.

 

Post a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published